Subject	well if the 32.57 air barometer was right that would of
Posted by	Andrew(nj) on May 08, 2005 at 4:32 AM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	Yeah, I don't think they input those conditions right, lol posted by boileralum on May 08, 2005 at 04:28 AM
Message	been perfect to get some very low times w/ the car.
Follow Ups	Well, it wasn't very pretty, but it gives me #16 on Arnel's - boileralum 04:13:45 05/08/05 167f 100%humidity 32.57 barometer thats weird... - Andrew(nj) 04:21:11 05/08/05 Yeah, I don't think they input those conditions right, lol - boileralum 04:28:33 05/08/05 well if the 32.57 air barometer was right that would of - Andrew(nj) 04:32:50 05/08/05 . - T(Seattle) 05:58:56 05/08/05 Flippity floppity floop. - Kenny 04:22:31 05/08/05 Great numbers Rich! - SilverTwin(OH) 06:16:15 05/08/05 I guess my time is protected - for now.. ;) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 13:37:54 05/08/05 Heheh, yup. Your time does make for a nice target ;) (n/m) - boileralum 13:55:02 05/08/05 Good thing I'm racing again in 4 days - shooting for 11.5 if - Scotts94z32 10:10:55 05/09/05 How much boost were you running and what was the - SirpriZ 15:21:06 05/08/05 I was hitting 1.3 bar on my boost gauge, though the AVC-R - boileralum 15:56:03 05/08/05 .032 should be fine at 1.3 bar. If you plan on running - SirpriZ 16:30:39 05/08/05 Thanks, Mark. BTW, is there a list for upgraded TTs w/ oem - boileralum 17:20:47 05/08/05 Hey Rich. I don't think there is a seperate list for the - SirpriZ 17:36:36 05/08/05 Yeah, I was being facetious. But I know just glancing at - boileralum 00:09:02 05/09/05 Geez, I'm slow on the draw, I just picked up the wink, - SirpriZ 00:52:26 05/09/05 No problem, thanks. :) (n/m) - boileralum 09:31:01 05/09/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.